The information a mining community uses most rarely comes from the mine - Engineering & Mining Africa The information a mining community uses most rarely comes from the mine - Engineering & Mining Africa

The information a mining community uses most rarely comes from the mine

A panicked WhatsApp voice note can cross a mining town before anyone at the actual mine’s head office has confirmed whether it’s true. By the time a mine issues an official response, the story has already been decided by people who were never going to see it anyway.

Regulation 42 of the Mineral and Petroleum Resources Development Act requires an approved Social and Labour Plan (SLP) before the state will grant a mining right. South Africa’s mines employed 470 457 people last year, and every one of those operations carries a Social and Labour Plan covering neighbours who mostly are not on the payroll at all but who are major stakeholders nonetheless.

These SLPs set out a mine’s housing strategy, its skills programme, local procurement targets and its commitments to the surrounding community, typically running five years before it needs revising, with progress reported to the Department of Mineral and Petroleum Resources every year. Nowhere does the regulation say how a mine should talk to those neighbours in the years between those milestones.

That gap is where the trouble can often start. Earlier this year, residents on South Africa’s Wild Coast learned that an organisation had applied to prospect on their land from a notice printed in the Daily Dispatch. Circulating a notice in this way is very much the legal standard: correctly filed and entirely public, and yet it is still largely invisible to the people whose land was at stake. By the end of 2025, South Africa had 51,7 million internet users and 27,9 million Facebook users, according to DataReportal’s most recent count. Statistics South Africa’s 2022 Census and General Household Survey found 78% to 80% of households access the internet, with over 60% relying primarily on mobile devices. What that comes down to is that an unofficial claim posted to a community Facebook group travels further in an hour than a newspaper notice manages in a week.

But, on the other hand, relying on open social media pages like Facebook or Instagram to balance the scales isn’t a feasible solution either. Public feeds operate on algorithms that deliberately reward outrage and debate over calm, operational facts, meaning an official notice or safety update is routinely buried. At the same time, turning communities over to commercial networks carries an implicit cost: it exposes residents to third-party data tracking and ad-targeting, monetising the community’s attention rather than safeguarding it.

None of this is news to the mining industry itself. Minerals Council South Africa’s own head of social performance, Alex Khumalo, told Engineering News four years ago already, in 2022, that the industry needed to close a trust deficit with the people living around its operations, but little has changed since. Communities routinely have limited input into how Social and Labour Plans are drawn up, let alone how they are carried out on the ground. Corruption Watch’s 2024 Best Practice Guideline on community consultation, produced with the law firm Webber Wentzel, went further, finding engagement across the industry inconsistent and often ineffective.

What fills that hole is whatever moves fastest, and that is rarely the mine’s own efforts. The industry recorded 41 workplace deaths in 2025, its lowest annual toll on record, but fatalities at gold mines nearly doubled year on year, from 11 to 21, and deaths from rock falls rose by a quarter. By the end of July 2026, the year-to-date number had risen to 33 – a figure within a stone’s throw from the full-year total of 2025, and with five months still to go.

Industry bodies have this year indicated that interruptions to bulk water supply had hit several mining regions during 2025, and that water security was now a shared concern for operations and the communities around them.

Communities depend on information flowing from the mine because so much of what happens in and around the mine itself directly affects them. But still, news of a rockfall, for instance, spreads through a group chat long before the shift manager has confirmed who was underground, and a discoloured puddle around a borehole becomes “evidence of contamination” before anyone from the mine has tested it. Crucially, miners are often part of the community; so, when a workforce is kept in the dark, workers inadvertently carry workplace anxieties and half-truths home to their families and local WhatsApp groups.

Community protests over jobs and infrastructure, rather than environmental complaints, are a long-documented pattern in South African mining. A false closure rumour, shared an hour after an unrelated and genuine retrenchment notice goes out, does not pause for an official communications team to catch up. By the time a formal statement clears legal and gets sign-off, the version that travelled fastest has already decided what the community believes.

What a Social and Labour Plan cannot do by itself

An approved SLP is a big compliance achievement, but community trust is a very separate one, built or lost in the years between site visits and annual reports, when nobody from the mine is required to be there at all. A locked noticeboard at the mine gate and a printed circular routed through the local municipal office were designed for a community without smartphones. These days the population is online with relatives who work inside it and others who don’t and never will. But that community is still very much talking about the mine on its own terms.

The fix is mostly a matter of who the mine is willing to speak to directly, and how often. A mine that pushes verified updates straight to affected households, in the languages people use, on the channel they check first each morning, can correct a false shaft-closure and retrenchment claim before it becomes the reason a road gets blockaded. That is a far cheaper problem to solve than the protest, the production stoppage or the parliamentary question it prevents. Some organisations in mining and metals already understand this logic when it comes to their own workforce. Equipping those employees with real-time facts turns them into trusted local ambassadors, rather than messengers of rumour. The same discipline, extended beyond the mine fence to the people who live next to it, is overdue.

South Africa’s mining industry has spent real money and real years bringing its fatality numbers down, one incident report and one intervention at a time. Its information record deserves the same discipline, because the next false claim about a job, an accident or a water source is already forming in a group chat somewhere in the country, and it will not wait for the next scheduled site visit to spread.

Merel van der Lei, CEO of Wyzetalk
Scroll to Top